Seeing the tendency to generalize the bad actions of religious representatives and people who call themselves religious and do everything contrary to what the religious texts say and seeing especially with astonishment as scientists question not religion, but the sacred texts and where evidently demonstrate that they have not even read them. Surprising, because as a scientist to give a scientific or professional opinion about a fact or a book you should have at least read it and consulted about it first? For the above mentioned I decided to investigate and make relations, connections and scientific conjectures based on the sacred books of the religions; all the conjectures and suppositions I made trying as much as possible not to fall in pre judgments or dogmatic belief, that is to say, to base the conjecture based on what was written thousands of years ago or based on objective facts, thus leaving open the possibility for the reader to draw his own conclusions.pSeeing the tendency to generalize the bad actions of religious representatives and people who call themselves religious and do everything contrary to what the religious texts say and seeing especially with astonishment as scientists question not religion, but the sacred texts and where evidently demonstrate that they have not even read them. Surprising, because as a scientist to give a scientific or professional opinion about a fact or a book you should have at least read it and consulted about it first? For the above mentioned I decided to investigate and make relations, connections and scientific conjectures based on the sacred books of the religions; all the conjectures and suppositions I made trying as much as possible not to fall in pre judgments or dogmatic belief, that is to say, to base the conjecture based on what was written thousands of years ago or based on objective facts, thus leaving open the possibility for the reader to draw his own conclusions./p